The operationalization of bilingual linguistic experience and its relationship with executive function

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.58423/2786-6726/2024-2-109-127

Keywords:

linguistic experiences, executive function, bilingualism, multilingualism, language proficiency, language acquisition, tendencies of language use

Abstract

Research of the relation between linguistic experiences and the executive function have been a hot topic in the field of psycholinguistics for over two decades. Considerable body of studies have provided both supporting and challenging evidence for the existence of such relation. The final answer about the relation between the linguistic experiences and the executive function has not been obtained yet, due to reconsiderations of the established methodological approaches and new theories still being developed, which challenge the validity of earlier findings. This article is an attempt to summarize and explain current trends in this line of studies, specifically focusing on the issue of operationalization of linguistic experiences. Bilingualism and multilingualism are complex constructs, composed of multiple elements that can have unique, independent effects on cognition, including language proficiency, manner and duration of language acquisition, current tendencies of language use. Earlier studies had a tendency to focus on a single element of language experience for categorical distinction between monolinguals and bilinguals, converging the great variability in the latter under a single category.  Each element of linguistic experience has to be accounted for and carefully operationalized in a way that would allow reasonable comparison between different research on the topic. In addition to exploring the effects of various elements of linguistic experiences on cognitive control, interactions between those experiences also demand attention, which have been largely overlooked. Finally, each study has to be backed up by a solid theoretical background, which was argued to be a problem for the research of the relation between the linguistic experiences and the executive function, but has great potential for resolving the inconsistencies in research findings. Not all experiences with languages require effortful cognitive processing and adaptations, and even if some might, a comprehensive theory is required to explain how cognitive adaptations for language use can be generalized for other domains of cognition.

Author Biography

Volodymyr Revniuk, University of Pannonia

University of Pannonia, Multilingualism Doctoral School, PhD student.

References

Abrahamsson, N. – Hyltenstam, K. 2008. The robustness of aptitude effects in near-native second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 30/4: pp. 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1017/S027226310808073X

Antón, E. – Duñabeitia, J. A. – Estévez, A. – Hernández, J. A. – Castillo, A. – Fuentes, L. J. – Davidson, D. J. – Carreiras, M. 2014. Is there a bilingual advantage in the ANT task? Evidence from children. Frontiers in Psychology 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00398

Bakker, M. 2015. Power problems: N > 138. Cortex 73: pp. 367–368. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.006

Barker, R. M. – Bialystok, E. 2019. Processing differences between monolingual and bilingual young adults on an emotion n-back task. Brain and Cognition 134: pp. 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2019.05.004

Beatty-Martínez, A. L. – Navarro-Torres, C. A. – Dussias, P. E. – Bajo, M. T. – Guzzardo Tamargo, R. E. – Kroll, J. F. 2019. Interactional context mediates the consequences of bilingualism for language and cognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000770

Bialystok, E. 2001. Bilingualism in Development: Language, Literacy, and Cognition (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511605963

Bialystok, E. 2009. Bilingualism: The good, the bad, and the indifferent. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 12/1: pp. 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728908003477

Bialystok, E. 2016. The signal and the noise: Finding the pattern in human behaviour. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 6/5: pp. 517–534. https://doi.org/10.1075/lab.15040.bia

Bialystok, E. – Craik, F. I. M. 2022. How does bilingualism modify cognitive function? Attention to the mechanism. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 29/4: pp. 1246–1269. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-022-02057-5

Bialystok, E. – Craik, F. I. M. – Klein, R. – Viswanathan, M. 2004. Bilingualism, Aging, and Cognitive Control: Evidence from the Simon Task. Psychology and Aging 19/2: pp. 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.19.2.290

Bialystok, E. – Craik, F. – Luk, G. 2008. Cognitive control and lexical access in younger and older bilinguals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 34/4: pp. 859–873. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.859

Bogulski, C. A. – Rakoczy, M. – Goodman, M. – Bialystok, E. 2015. Executive control in fluent and lapsed bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 18/3: pp. 561–567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728914000856

Carlson, S. M. – Meltzoff, A. N. 2008. Bilingual experience and executive functioning in young children. Developmental Science 11/2: pp. 282–298. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00675.x

Chung-Fat-Yim, A. – Sorge, G. B. – Bialystok, E. 2020. Continuous effects of bilingualism and attention on Flanker task performance. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23/5: pp. 1106–1111. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000036

Cockcroft, K. – Wigdorowitz, M. – Liversage, L. 2019. A multilingual advantage in the components of working memory. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22/1: pp. 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000475

Costa, A. – Hernández, M. – Costa-Faidella, J. – Sebastián-Gallés, N. 2009. On the bilingual advantage in conflict processing: Now you see it, now you don’t. Cognition 113/2: pp. 135–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.08.001

De Cat, C. – Gusnanto, A. – Serratrice, L. 2018. Identifying a threshold for the executive function advantage in bilingual children. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 40/1: pp. 119–151. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263116000486

De Cat, C. – Kašćelan, D. – Prévost, P. – Serratrice, L. – Tuller, L. – Unsworth, S. – The Q-BEx Consortium 2023. How to quantify bilingual experience? Findings from a Delphi consensus survey. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 26/1: pp. 112–124. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728922000359

DeLuca, V. – Rothman, J. – Bialystok, E. – Pliatsikas, C. 2019. Redefining bilingualism as a spectrum of experiences that differentially affects brain structure and function. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 116(15), 7565–7574. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1811513116

DeLuca, V. – Rothman, J. – Bialystok, E. – Pliatsikas, C. 2020. Duration and extent of bilingual experience modulate neurocognitive outcomes. NeuroImage 204, 116222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116222

Doroud, S. – Saeedi, Z. – Radman, N. 2020. Cognitive resilience in bilinguals and its potentiality in dealing with cognitive load [Preprint]. Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.17.301606

Duñabeitia, J. A. – Hernández, J. A. – Antón, E. – Macizo, P. – Estévez, A. – Fuentes, L. J. – Carreiras, M. 2014. The Inhibitory Advantage in Bilingual Children Revisited: Myth or Reality? Experimental Psychology 61/3: pp. 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000243

Festman, J. – Rodriguez-Fornells, A. – Münte, T. F. 2010. Individual differences in control of language interference in late bilinguals are mainly related to general executive abilities. Behavioral and Brain Functions 6/1: pp. 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1744-9081-6-5

Fink, A. – Goldrick, M. 2015. Pervasive benefits of preparation in language switching. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 22/3: pp. 808–814. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-014-0739-6

Gathercole, V. C. M. – Thomas, E. M. – Kennedy, I. – Prys, C. – Young, N. – Viñas Guasch, N. – Roberts, E. J. – Hughes, E. K. – Jones, L. 2014. Does language dominance affect cognitive performance in bilinguals? Lifespan evidence from preschoolers through older adults on card sorting, Simon, and metalinguistic tasks. Frontiers in Psychology 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00011

Grainger, J. – Dijkstra, T. 1992. On the Representation and Use of Language Information in Bilinguals. Advances in Psychology 83: pp. 207–220. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)61496-X

Granena, G. – Long, M. H. 2013. Age of onset, length of residence, language aptitude, and ultimate L2 attainment in three linguistic domains. Second Language Research 29/3: pp. 311–343. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658312461497

Green, D. W. 1998. Mental control of the bilingual lexico-semantic system. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1/2: pp. 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728998000133

Green, D. W. – Abutalebi, J. 2013. Language control in bilinguals: The adaptive control hypothesis. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25/5: pp. 515–530. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.796377

Grosjean, F. – Li, P. 2013. The psycholinguistics of bilingualism. Wiley-Blackwell.

Gullifer, J. W. – Chai, X. J. – Whitford, V. – Pivneva, I. – Baum, S. – Klein, D. – Titone, D. 2018. Bilingual experience and resting-state brain connectivity: Impacts of L2 age of acquisition and social diversity of language use on control networks. Neuropsychologia 117: pp. 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.04.037

Gullifer, J. W. – Titone, D. 2020. Characterizing the social diversity of bilingualism using language entropy. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23/2: pp. 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728919000026

Hartanto, A. – Yang, H. 2016. Disparate bilingual experiences modulate task-switching advantages: A diffusion-model analysis of the effects of interactional context on switch costs. Cognition 150: pp. 10–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2016.01.016

Hartanto, A. – Yang, H. 2020. The role of bilingual interactional contexts in predicting interindividual variability in executive functions: A latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 149/4: pp. 609–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000672

Hartsuiker, R. J. 2015. Why it is pointless to ask under which specific circumstances the bilingual advantage occurs. Cortex 73: pp. 336–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.018

Janus, M. – Bialystok, E. 2018. Working Memory with Emotional Distraction in Monolingual and Bilingual Children. Frontiers in Psychology 9, 1582. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01582

Jiao, L. – Liu, C. – Wang, R. – Chen, B. 2019. Working memory demand of a task modulates bilingual advantage in executive functions. International Journal of Bilingualism 23/1: pp. 102–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006917709097

Kałamała, P. – Szewczyk, J. – Chuderski, A. – Senderecka, M. – Wodniecka, Z. 2020. Patterns of bilingual language use and response inhibition: A test of the adaptive control hypothesis. Cognition 204, 104373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104373

Kheder, S. – Kaan, E. 2021. Cognitive control in bilinguals: Proficiency and code-switching both matter. Cognition 209, 104575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104575

Khodos, I. – Moskovsky, C. – Paolini, S. 2021. Bilinguals’ and monolinguals’ performance on a non-verbal cognitive control task: How bilingual language experience contributes to cognitive performance by reducing mixing and switching costs. International Journal of Bilingualism 25/1: pp. 189–204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006920946401

Kramer, R. – Mota, M. B. 2015. Effects of bilingualism on inhibitory control and working memory: a study with early and late bilinguals. Gragoatá 20/38. https://doi.org/10.22409/gragoata.v20i38.33312

Kroll, J. F. – Bobb, S. C. – Wodniecka, Z. 2006. Language selectivity is the exception, not the rule: Arguments against a fixed locus of language selection in bilingual speech. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 9/2: pp. 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728906002483

Lai, G. – O’Brien, B. A. 2020. Examining Language Switching and Cognitive Control Through the Adaptive Control Hypothesis. Frontiers in Psychology 11, 1171. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01171

Li, P. – Sepanski, S. – Zhao, X. 2006. Language history questionnaire: A Web-based interface for bilingual research. Behavior Research Methods 38/2: pp. 202–210. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192770

Li, P. – Zhang, F. – Yu, A. – Zhao, X. 2020. Language History Questionnaire (LHQ3): An enhanced tool for assessing multilingual experience. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 23/5: pp. 938–944. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918001153

Luk, G. – Bialystok, E. 2013. Bilingualism is not a categorical variable: Interaction between language proficiency and usage. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25/5: pp. 605–621. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2013.795574

Luk, G. – Bialystok, E. – Craik, F. I. M. – Grady, C. L. 2011. Lifelong Bilingualism Maintains White Matter Integrity in Older Adults. Journal of Neuroscience 31/46: pp. 16808–16813. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4563-11.2011

Marian, V. – Blumenfeld, H. K. – Kaushanskaya, M. 2007. The Language Experience and Proficiency Questionnaire (LEAP-Q): Assessing Language Profiles in Bilinguals and Multilinguals. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50/4: pp. 940–967. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2007/067)

Miyake, A. – Friedman, N. P. 2012. The Nature and Organization of Individual Differences in Executive Functions: Four General Conclusions. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21/1: pp. 8–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411429458

Mosca, M. – de Bot, K. 2017. Bilingual Language Switching: Production vs. Recognition. Frontiers in Psychology 8, 934. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00934

Muñoz, C. ed. 2006. Age and the Rate of Foreign Language Learning. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781853598937

Paap, K. 2019. The Bilingual Advantage Debate: Quantity and Quality of the Evidence. In: J. W. Schwieter – M. Paradis eds. The Handbook of the Neuroscience of Multilingualism (First Edition). Wiley. pp. 701–735. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119387725.ch34

Paap, K. – Greenberg, Z. I. 2013. There is no coherent evidence for a bilingual advantage in executive processing. Cognitive Psychology 66/2: pp. 232–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.12.002

Paap, K. – Johnson, H. – Sawi, O. 2015. Bilingual advantages in executive functioning either do not exist or are restricted to very specific and undetermined circumstances. Cortex 69: 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.04.014

Paap, K. – M. Sawi, O. – Dalibar, C. – Darrow, J. – A. Johnson, H. – Language, Attention, Cognitive Engineering (LACE) Lab, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA, USA 2014. The Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Cognitive Benefits of Bilingualism may be Extraordinarily Difficult to Discover. AIMS Neuroscience 1/3: pp. 245–256. https://doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2014.3.245

Paap, K. R. – Mason, L. – Anders-Jefferson, R. 2021. Predictions about the Cognitive Consequences of Language Switching on Executive Functioning Inspired by the Adaptive Control Hypothesis Fail More Often than Not. Brain Sciences 11/9, 1217. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11091217

Paap, K. R. – Sawi, O. M. 2014. Bilingual advantages in executive functioning: Problems in convergent validity, discriminant validity, and the identification of the theoretical constructs. Frontiers in Psychology 5. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00962

Piske, T. – Flege, J. E. – MacKay, I. R. A. – Meador, D. 2002. The Production of English Vowels by Fluent Early and Late Italian-English Bilinguals. Phonetica 59/1: pp. 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1159/000056205

Pot, A. – Keijzer, M. – de Bot, K. 2018. Intensity of Multilingual Language Use Predicts Cognitive Performance in Some Multilingual Older Adults. Brain Sciences 8/5, 92. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8050092

Prior, A. – Gollan, T. H. 2011. Good Language-Switchers are Good Task-Switchers: Evidence from Spanish–English and Mandarin–English Bilinguals. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 17/4: pp. 682–691. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617711000580

Revniuk, V. – Bátyi, S. 2023. The relationship between bilingual language control and language dominance: An empirical study of visual language perception. East European Journal of Psycholinguistics 10/2. https://doi.org/10.29038/eejpl.2023.10.2.rev

Reynolds, M. G. – Schlöffel, S. – Peressotti, F. 2016. Asymmetric Switch Costs in Numeral Naming and Number Word Reading: Implications for Models of Bilingual Language Production. Frontiers in Psychology 6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02011

Sanchez-Azanza, V. A. – López-Penadés, R. – Adrover-Roig, D. 2020. More similitudes than differences between bilinguals and monolinguals on speeded and demand-varying executive tasks. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 35/8: pp. 992–1009. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2019.1706752

Soveri, A. – Rodriguez-Fornells, A. – Laine, M. 2011. Is There a Relationship between Language Switching and Executive Functions in Bilingualism? Introducing a within group Analysis Approach. Frontiers in Psychology 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00183

Surrain, S. – Luk, G. 2019. Describing bilinguals: A systematic review of labels and descriptions used in the literature between 2005–2015. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 22/2: pp. 401–415. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728917000682

Thanissery, N. – Parihar, P. – Kar, B. R. 2020. Language proficiency, sociolinguistic factors and inhibitory control among bilinguals. Journal of Cultural Cognitive Science 4/2: pp. 217–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41809-020-00065-2

Treccani, B. – Mulatti, C. 2015. No matter who, no matter how… and no matter whether the white matter matters. Why theories of bilingual advantage in executive functioning are so difficult to falsify. Cortex 73: 349–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.07.015

Von Bastian, C. C. – Souza, A. S. – Gade, M. 2016. No evidence for bilingual cognitive advantages: A test of four hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 145/2: pp. 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000120

Xie, Z. – Dong, Y. 2017. Contributions of bilingualism and public speaking training to cognitive control differences among young adults. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20/1: pp. 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000474

Yang, H. – Hartanto, A. – Yang, S. 2016. The importance of bilingual experience in assessing bilingual advantages in executive functions. Cortex 75, pp. 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2015.11.018

Yang, H. – Yang, S. 2017. Are all interferences bad? Bilingual advantages in working memory are modulated by varying demands for controlled processing. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 20/1: pp. 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728915000632

Yim, O. – Bialystok, E. 2012. Degree of conversational code-switching enhances verbal task switching in Cantonese–English bilinguals. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 15/4: pp. 873–883. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728912000478

Downloads

Published

2024-11-03